
When good intentions go too far
What a Coaching Scenario is
Not quiz style. This is judgement practice — you're put inside a real situation from human-services work and asked what you would actually do. It draws on the knowledge you use on the job, not the kind you can look up.
Every choice changes what happens next, and every choice gets a coaching beat straight after it: what drew you toward that option, and how it played out. What's held back is the verdict on your path, so you stay with what you'd genuinely do rather than working out what you're supposed to say.
- 4 decisions
- Each one shaped by the one before it. No two paths through are the same.
- Coaching as you go
- A beat after every decision, naming the pull behind your choice and where it led.
- A full debrief
- Your whole path replayed at the end, with the reasoning behind each decision you made.
- Evidence you can keep
- A completed scenario is recorded in your PracticeLab and appears in your downloadable ProofKit.
Scenarios are made to be talked about. Most people finish one still turning it over, which makes them a ready-made prompt for supervision, a team meeting or a conversation with a colleague — everyone walks the same situation, and comparing where you each landed is often where the real learning happens.
This one ends with
Next time you see a volunteer going above and beyond, ask yourself: is this an act of care, or is it the start of a boundary that needs a conversation before it gets harder to have?
The situation
You manage a small women's refuge. The organisation runs on a lean budget, a tight staff team, and a group of volunteers who genuinely care about the women you support. One of those volunteers — Robyn — has been with you for nearly three years. She's warm, dependable, and the kind of person who remembers birthdays and notices when someone is having a bad day. The staff trust her. The clients trust her. You trust her.
Over the past few weeks you've noticed Robyn has started driving a client, Amara, to medical and legal appointments in her own car. You weren't aware this was happening until a staff member mentioned it in passing. When you look into it, you also learn that Robyn has given Amara her personal mobile number so Amara can contact her directly between visits.
You speak briefly with Amara, who becomes visibly anxious when you raise it. She says quietly: "Robyn is the only person I can rely on. Please don't take that away from me." You can see she means it. Amara is at an early and fragile stage of rebuilding her life, and the connection she has with Robyn is clearly real.
You know Robyn has done all of this out of genuine care — not to undermine the organisation, not to create a parallel support relationship intentionally. But you also know that what she's doing sits outside her volunteer role, creates uninsured transport risk, bypasses the organisation's communication protocols, and sets up a dynamic that is difficult to sustain and harder to exit safely if things go wrong. You need to act.
What you're practising
Before you start, notice
Real-world decisions in scenarios like this are shaped as much by feeling as by reasoning. People often notice one of these pulls — naming what you feel before you decide is half the skill.
- Gratitude for committed volunteers — and the reluctance to seem like you're punishing kindness
- Protectiveness toward Amara — and the fear that any change will hurt her
- Discomfort with a conversation that feels like it will upset someone who doesn't deserve it
- The pull to quietly manage the situation without making it formal
Policies this draws on
- Your organisation's volunteer code of conduct
- Your organisation's transport and insurance policy
- Your organisation's client confidentiality policy
- Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) / Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (NZ)
- Your own organisation's policies take precedence — check them where they apply.
Heads up — coaching scenarios work differently. You'll make a sequence of decisions as the situation unfolds, and after each one you'll get a coaching beat: what drew you toward that choice, and how it played out. The one thing held back is the verdict on the path you took — that lands in the debrief at the end, with your whole walk replayed alongside it.
New to Good Practice Hub? Coaching Scenarios come with PracticeLab Pro, or browse the practice library to see what else is there.
More Coaching Scenarios
See the whole library
Coaching ScenarioIt's Friday night. This can't wait... Can it?
It's 8pm on a Friday when your phone buzzes with a new email. You're the Board Chair of a mid-sized community health and social services organisation. The sender is Emilia, a programme coordinator you've met twice at staff events. The subject line reads: 'Something you need to know — please keep this confidential'.
Governance · ~12 minutes
You already voted. Now you know something new.
You are the Chair of a mid-sized not-for-profit that provides community mental health services. Three weeks ago, at the last board meeting, the board voted six to one to award a significant service delivery contract — worth roughly $480,000 over two years — to Brightpath Community Services. The decision was made after a competitive tender process managed by the CEO, and the board was satisfied it represented good value and mission alignment.
Governance · ~12 minutes
The conflict of interest you didn't see
You've been on the board of a community health organisation for two years. You're the longest-serving director other than the chair, and you've developed a real feel for the organisation — its funding challenges, its staff culture, and the populations it serves. You care about it.
Governance · ~12 minutes